If they didn't put cover sheets on the documents, then they would be taking photos of classified material. And those photographs are sent out to various people working on the case. Few of whom I would think have top level security clearance.
Putting a cover sheet on sensitive material isn't sketchy or even unheard of. It's the same thing they do when evidence they're collecting contains child pornography. No one wants that to be circulated around.
As long as it's clearly marked that it's a cover sheet, which seems to be the case here, there's nothing wrong with doing this.
I'm not sure what the issue is here in the first place. Did someone think they were trying to sneak something into the documents and then say Trump stole them?
If they didn't put cover sheets on the documents, then they would be taking photos of classified material. And those photographs are sent out to various people working on the case. Few of whom I would think have top level security clearance.
Putting a cover sheet on sensitive material isn't sketchy or even unheard of. It's the same thing they do when evidence they're collecting contains child pornography. No one wants that to be circulated around.
As long as it's clearly marked that it's a cover sheet, which seems to be the case here, there's nothing wrong with doing this.
I'm not sure what the issue is here in the first place. Did someone think they were trying to sneak something into the documents and then say Trump stole them?