I think it would be helpful if people would do some basic fact checking and research on this.

The first thing to do would be to look into the crime scene investigation methods used by law enforcement. The FBI has a section on CSI methods on their website. You can ask your librarian for books about it. Or you can look for books and articles online about CSI methods. P]lease don't just watch an episode of CSI: Miami and think you've done research. And please don't just look up sites that agree with you and call that research, either.

Just some of the basics I learned when looking into this:

Everything gathered from a crime scene (or whatever the scene at Mar-a-lago is called) is logged into an inventory list as evidence. All files are separately inventoried. Even empty folders are separately inventoried. It's not up to the investigator to decide what is important enough to be inventoried. EVERYTHING related to the case is inventoried. This is CSI 101.

In regards to the cover sheets; it seems obvious to me that classified documents shouldn't be photographed in a way that, should the documents be leaked, the entire world would be able to learn classified information. I really have a hard time understanding why this seems so implausible to anyone. Not only do cover sheets protect the classified information in the documents, they provide a way to tag the documents for the inventory list. This is a routine thing done by CSIs. In the case of paper files, the person handling the evidence logs it by placing a cover sheet on the document with the name of the person gathering the evidence, the date, the case number, description of what the document is, signature of the person collecting evidence, signature of the person in charge of the scene, and some other things I'm forgetting.

Here is why I'm arguing with you lot over this:

There is zero evidence of these claims being made. Someone just types it up in a Twitter/X post and hits enter. Then it's linked here by someone who did nothing other than read the post. And then people read it and jump on their keyboards, all full of righteous indignation and anger and say things like it's treason and that the people involved in the investigation should be executed. They saw someone say it on Twitter, and that's evidence enough for them! How exactly does that fit in with this being an elite research board?

Not only that, some of the things being said lacks common sense. Do people really think that only some of the evidence should be cataloged, and the rest be, what? chucked into the garbage? Just left in a box that will be thrown into some corner and forgotten?

And what sense does it make to photograph classified information, knowing that the photographs will be leaked and the entire world will then have access to that classified information? I get the feeling the people saying this are just angry they can't read what the documents say. Either that, or they don't understand the concept of the word "classified".

I'm not trying to hurt anyone's feelings here when I argue with people over things like this. I'm trying to show people that they need to up their game. They need to learn how to make better arguments when trying to redpill others. They need to know at least the basics of what they're talking about when they're trying to convince a normie to believe them.

When you put stuff like this out there amongst normies, and make comments like you've made here to me, you lose all credibility with anyone who understands basic ideas like not photographing classified documents when you know that they will be leaked. 🤷‍♀️

And before someone responds with something along the lines of "Why should I care what the normies think?", aren't we supposed to be trying to get them over here to our side? Why would anyone want to give you the time of day, much less change their entire view on life once their eyes have been opened, when you make absurd arguments like the ones here. What confidence do you think you can inspire in them when you make zero efforts to check that what you're telling them is true?

And for the love of everything Holy, don't get in front of any camera or microphone pointed at you at any sort of public gathering concerning Trump. No matter how nice the person wanting to "interview" you seems, they are not your friend, and they are not on your side. They just want to make you, and by extension Q and all other Anons, look like uneducated bumbling idiots.

So please. Pretty please with a cherry on top, start doing basic research on something before committing to a stance on an issue (especially something like execution!). Don't just believe some random person's Twitter post because you want it to be true. Learn how to make better arguments. Don't take it personally if someone asks you for evidence of what you're telling them.