We don't know the terms of any of these settlements.
It's possible the meeting happened. It's also possible it didn't. Where does that put matters in terms of a defamation suit? Plaintiff has to prove malice.
The DUI Coomer video doesn't indicate mad $$$ are coming in. Who is working all these cases for him? Most lawyers won't even have a conversation unless you have ten grand floating around.
we conclude that Coomer has met his burden of establishing a reasonable likelihood that he will be able to prove
actual malice by clear and convincing evidence.
This is why I think when someone settles after this ruling, the settlement is favorable to Coomer.
Also
On page 68 they discuss "Falsity."
They mention this
(2) Oltmann originally said it was
a phone call but later said it was a Zoom call;
The rhetoric from the judges is definitely in Coomer's favor in every instance that I saw, to the point that they sound as though they're arguing on his behalf rather than judging.
But if true, why isn't Coomer blinging it up and hitting the victory circuit like E. Jean? Instead he's doing kitchen work and keeping a very low profile.
It appears he is claiming to not have a copy! There are piles of Coomer cases but it seems like more what they actually had was based on his social media.
Was the tape entered into the court record?
There has never been a copy of any such tape. It seems the call may have never existed.
About 6 people have settled lawsuits with Coomer.
One America News Chanel Rion Sidney Powell Newsmax
Coomer is probably doing very well for himself.
We don't know the terms of any of these settlements.
It's possible the meeting happened. It's also possible it didn't. Where does that put matters in terms of a defamation suit? Plaintiff has to prove malice.
The DUI Coomer video doesn't indicate mad $$$ are coming in. Who is working all these cases for him? Most lawyers won't even have a conversation unless you have ten grand floating around.
In April, the appeals court let the case go forward.
https://www.courts.state.co.us/Courts/Court_of_Appeals/Opinion/2024/22CA0843-PD.pdf On page 81 they say
This is why I think when someone settles after this ruling, the settlement is favorable to Coomer.
Also On page 68 they discuss "Falsity." They mention this (2) Oltmann originally said it was a phone call but later said it was a Zoom call;
The rhetoric from the judges is definitely in Coomer's favor in every instance that I saw, to the point that they sound as though they're arguing on his behalf rather than judging.
But if true, why isn't Coomer blinging it up and hitting the victory circuit like E. Jean? Instead he's doing kitchen work and keeping a very low profile.
It appears he is claiming to not have a copy! There are piles of Coomer cases but it seems like more what they actually had was based on his social media.
https://conservativedaily.com/cd-livestream/6-june-2024-joe-walks-out-of-coomer-dominion-deposition-vs-clay-clark-reports-live