If Biden chooses to resign AFTER the convention, then the DNC gets to have a meeting and basically choose who they want to give all these delegates to as their new front runner. They made these new rules back in 2022 because this was always the plan. They realized they couldn’t rig it with the super delegates anymore after they pissed off their own base with Bernie so this was their new solution to still installing who they want.
Q: WHAT HAPPENS IF BIDEN STEPS DOWN AFTER THE CONVENTION?
A: If Biden steps down after the August convention, the 435 members of the Democratic National Committee would choose a new candidate. The members would meet in a special session to select a nominee.
Q: WHO ARE THESE 435 DNC MEMBERS?
A: They are divided equally between men and women as well as various constituency groups including labor leaders, LGBTQ representatives, and racial minorities. Of the total, 75 are appointed at-large by the chair, while the rest are elected in their respective states.
Q: WHO COULD NOMINATE AN ALTERNATIVE IN THAT CASE?
A: To nominate a candidate to replace Biden on the ballot, that person would have to have the support of a minimum number of DNC members -- perhaps around 60, though the exact number would be determined by the DNC's rules committee, which would lay out the rules for the proceedings before they started.
First sauce: https://www.reuters.com/world/us/how-democrats-could-replace-biden-presidential-candidate-before-november-2024-06-28/
Under Article 2 of The Bylaws of the Democratic Party, the Democratic National Committee (DNC) has the responsibility to fill vacancies in presidential and vice presidential nominations between national conventions.
In the event of a vacancy on the national ticket, the chairperson would call a special meeting. Under Article 2 § 8(d), questions before the DNC, with some exceptions otherwise outlined in the charter and bylaws, are determined by a majority vote of the DNC members who are present and voting by proxy. The bylaws also state that voting to fill a vacancy on the national ticket must proceed in accordance with procedural rules adopted by the Rules and Bylaws Committee and approved by the DNC.
Second sauce: https://ballotpedia.org/State_laws_and_party_rules_on_replacing_a_presidential_nominee,_2024
Id also like to reference this Q post that specifically talks about this:
Why are they pushing back the [D] convention?
COVID-19 concern or strategic for last minute change?
Change of Batter coming?
WHY WAS SHE 'saved' from officially announcing?
WHY WAS SHE 'reserved' for a last minute change?
How do you attempt to 'sneak one in'?
Was about to post this article. Their answer to the question:
“Is it possible that the nomination could still be overturned? Sure. After two-and-a-half centuries of American politics, it’s clear that just about any damn-fool thing is possible. But the DNC would have to outright steal Biden’s delegates. This would be tricky, to say the least. Biden is a sitting president, not a Bernie Sanders who can be bought off with a house. The delegates are Democrats, but they are largely state party officials, independent of the national party and in particular the DNC. They cannot simply be ordered to switch their votes. They would need to be persuaded, threatened, or bribed. The possibility of this occurring without a massive public blowback is nil.
The Democrats do possess a large number of “superdelegates,” consisting of upper-level party officials, current officeholders, state governors, and former party leaders (Bill Clinton is one of them, but not Hillary). But these number under 800, so there’s simply not enough to overcome the state delegates already pledged to SloJoe (California alone will send around 530, including alternates).”
Edit: the article also specifies that if this did occur, it would have to be someone who filed with the election commission by the December 2023 deadline. Did Big Mike file?
This article relies on Biden being replaced before the DNC convention. I am talking about after the convention and it is 100% legal and possible as they have already set up the procedures for it to occur. The article is irrelevant to the point I am making, after the convention, not before.
Perhaps I’m misreading the article but as I interpret this, the text I pasted above addresses their ability to oust Joe at any time so long as they can get enough delegates or superdelegates to change their stance, which the article is saying is a Herculean, if not impossible, undertaking.
Yeah I would absolutely agree that if the premise was at any time for whatever reason, this article would be absolutely correct.
But if it were done in a specific way at a certain time, they literally wrote their own loophole to do so a while ago which is why Q even pointed it out to us. If certain criteria are met, then they really can pick whoever they want. All they have to do is set the stage so that those criteria are met and boom, game on.
There’s not a doubt in my mind that they would be able to pull it off too. They literally deceived the entire world into thinking that what they do with kids is all one big conspiracy theory.