Justice Barrett’s comments have created a critical, largely overlooked opening for Democrats and their Special Counsel. Barrett hinted that if prosecutors concentrate exclusively on Trump’s private acts, they might succeed in their legal efforts against him.
Hardly a trojan horse. She is basically spelling out that private acts are not covered under immunity. They can go after his private acts if they want, and they have been doing it for the past 7 years and this is all they could come up with.
This part of the ruling is what terrifies the Lefties. Because the stuff done by a lot of other presidents (think about the $85K worth of hotdogs from chicago) are what Amy is pointing out are not covered.
Hardly a trojan horse. She is basically spelling out that private acts are not covered under immunity. They can go after his private acts if they want, and they have been doing it for the past 7 years and this is all they could come up with.
This part of the ruling is what terrifies the Lefties. Because the stuff done by a lot of other presidents (think about the $85K worth of hotdogs from chicago) are what Amy is pointing out are not covered.
65K
65K BBE*
*Before Biden's Economy. 85K under Joe.
Fair point
Hotdog inflation.
You are right! This place is filled with walking encyclopedias ! :)
😊
...two edged sword...