Law Professor Suggests Replacing Kamala Harris With Barack Obama as Biden’s 2024 Running Mate - The Great Awakening

Law Professor Suggests Replacing Kamala Harris With Barack Obama as Biden’s 2024 Running Mate (www.thegatewaypundit.com) Embarrassing!

posted 168 days ago by LakotaPride 168 days ago by LakotaPride +140 / -1

Law Professor Suggests Replacing Kamala Harris With Barack Obama as Biden's 2024 Running Mate | The Gateway Pundit | by Mike LaC...

As the left scrambles to figure out what to do with Joe Biden now that his mental decline has been exposed, one law professor from George Washington University is claiming he has a perfect fix.

101 comments

101 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (101)

sorted by:

▲ 6 ▼

– ZeroDeltaTango 6 points 167 days ago +6 / -0

But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.

I don't know why this wouldn't be the end of the discussion. Because it is.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 5 ▼

– photobuf 5 points 167 days ago +5 / -0

Me either! On the other hand, I don't think Kamala is legally the VP according to the Constitution either! Evidently the Constitution means nothing to the Democrats!

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 4 ▼

– Inidaho 4 points 167 days ago +4 / -0

I agree with you, but considering this is some some law professor testing the waters with this and saying that “many like minded other scholars agree”, then it seems obvious why this dialogue continues.

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q