interesting point about the SC immunity decision. any lawfags wanna address the second half of this?
(media.greatawakening.win)
🧐 Research Wanted 🤔
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (31)
sorted by:
Yas
Okay, thanks for clarifying that. Those who want sauce here it is (page 4).
And yes, your answer is very well put.
That also means that in the example of Biden telling Ukrainian president to stop prosecution of Burisma, it also falls under this same SCOTUS immunity.
This may sound like a disappointment, but if we think a bit moe carefully it makes sense. This kind of act is an "official act" and is definitely "abuse of official power". Constitution already provides a remedy for addressing such corrupt behaviour - Impeachment.