Unless proven with court documents, at the time of Kamala’s birth, her parents were not U.S. citizens. They were foreign students. At the time of her birth, she was the daughter of non-citizens. This makes her an anchor baby. She is not eligible to hold the office of President.
(media.greatawakening.win)
💊 RED PILL 💊
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (75)
sorted by:
similar problem alleged in the vatican, the papal claimants from the last half century are argued to not have been Catholic, you need to be Catholic in order to be elected and become a pope
if it was proven for example Obama wasn't legally able to become president, then his official acts as president would become null and a current president would need to issue new acts to cover the gap that isn't accounted for; or if a current president claimant (like Biden) was proven to have been elected illegally, seemingly a new election would be required or the election would go to the next in line (I don't know what is specified legally if this is proven).
In a similar way, we think the "popes" since 1958 will have to have their positions considered vacated and a new pope would need to be elected to bring things up to speed to the current day.
in politics they may try to get away with this and succeed (kamala or obama) somewhat. in religion such attempts still can't produce a real pope so the illegal acts would have to be accounted for.
edit: in the last paragraph, I mean to compare this to the founding of America, which was technically illegal. in politics I think some technically illegal acts can acquire validity, but I don't think this applies in religion in the same way.