I've talked to consultants and lawyers, and have yet to have one of them disagree that the Chevron deference decisions are the most consequential SC decisions in a century in terms of striking at the heart of the Deep/Administrative State. Yet, I have not heard ONE WORD about it from ANY 'media' since the day the decisions were announced including Faux News/Business. It almost seems as if the media thinks that if they don't talk about it, it didn't happen... Anybody have any thoughts on this? Is everyone waiting for 'the other shoe to drop'? Pray tell what that might be....
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (68)
sorted by:
Why would they mention it.
This is an information war. They stand on the deep state side. They propagandize their audience. This is what every faction or side in a war will do. So they have lost a consequential battle that will erode their power structure. To broadcast that would be demoralizing and potentially lead to defections in their captured audience. So it doesn't get mentioned. Similar to how losing ground or battles in a kinetic war will go unmentioned or denied if it is not immediately obvious to the population ( sometimes even when it is obvious) -- remember Baghdad Bob.