Her dystopian "opinion" is in direct opposition to what the Second Amendment is about... namely an armed citizenry both for militia purposes AND for self defense.
Self defense is a natural, God-given right. What part of "shall not be infringed" does she not understand?
Her dystopian "opinion" is in direct opposition to what the Second Amendment is about... namely an armed citizenry both for militia purposes AND for self defense.
Self defense is a natural, God-given right. What part of "shall not be infringed" does she not understand?
EDIT: Who appointed this looser anyway?
Obama
figures....