Has someone quietly opened the floodgates for positive cancer publications discussing "conspiracy theory" treatments like Ivermectin Chlorine Dioxide? - The Great Awakening

192

Has someone quietly opened the floodgates for positive cancer publications discussing "conspiracy theory" treatments like Ivermectin Chlorine Dioxide?

posted 165 days ago by HelloDolly 165 days ago by HelloDolly +192 / -0

Have never been able to find this information so easily on Google before. Even discussing the much maligned "DON"T DRINK BLEACH!" and describing it as "without side effects" LOL. Interdasting.

https://europepmc.org/article/ppr/ppr666536

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304383523001696

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09603271221143693

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36381770/

32 comments

32 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (32)

sorted by:

▲ 1 ▼

– What-Me-Worry 1 point 165 days ago +1 / -0

Thanks for sharing. Oftentimes, these folks are NOT willing to believe just one voice in the crowd.

Check out my comment from a few days ago regarding another Cancer post

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

You can lead them to the water, but you can't force them to drink.

Try sharing a couple Facebook Groups with them as a more successful alternative:

Beating Cancer Today

Fenbendazole - Cancer Support Group

Often times when they hear the consensus from hundreds of people, rather than us narrow-minded Conspiracy Theorists, they are more receptive to learning the truth.

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q