5 years exactly- It's so over for the bankers
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (42)
sorted by:
I gave you a specific example of one (the Eastern Roman Empire, from about 400-1400 AD). Why did you ignore it? That's not the only one, but I didn't want to burden you. My instincts were good on that account since apparently one example was already too much of a burden.
I mean... sure? But:
a) a thousand years of stability is a pretty good success. Calling it a "failure" because it eventually failed due to the Banksters is just a tad disingenuous.
b) exactly why it failed is another thing you ignored. It failed because the Banksters horded all the gold. But the Banksters can horde any currency. Thinking that BiC is somehow immune to hording is naive to the extreme, and completely ignores the processes by which a currency is horded.
BtC does not solve any of the problems that you put forth. I agree there are issues with relying on gold as a currency. But BtC does not address the fundamental problems and creates a whole bunch of it's own.
For example, unlike PMs, BtC not having any intrinsic value whatsoever is a huge problem. But far worse, it is a valueless "asset" that can also be horded, which is the first step in the fuckery for every problem with gold. Most of your protests are contrived problems created from the initial problem of hording. There are plenty of solutions to that. None of them are solved by BtC (as a currency).
You didn't even address what I said. Maybe you saw "a whole lot of nothing" because you didn't actually read anything.
You ignored how it ended.
How did bankers hoard all the gold? Because people gave it to them because its shit money
You haven't made a single coherent point, that's on you... and its why your money is worthless
I was talking about the economy of the EASTERN Roman Empire. As for that's ending, while I didn't give a lot of details, I explicitly told you how it ended, by the Bankster's hording gold. It was robust enough that it remained stable and thriving through a thousand years of direct attacks by the Banksters before it succumbed.
I mean... sorta? But
A) they gave it to them because the bankers owned all the stores where one buys stuff, just like today
B) they owned all the gold mines, which means any new influx of gold went straight into their coffers. Most BtC was mined by the CCP, which is an organization created and controlled by Rockefeller/Rothschild. All current productive mining is being controlled by corporations that are again, owned by Rockefeller/Rothschild and their ilk, one great big monopoly.
Now, I realize it may seem to be more widely distributed at the moment, but ownership is still pretty highly concentrated in the Corporate Monopoly that exists (see link above), and the "anonymous" distribution is almost certainly held primarily by the same entity, because they literally own all the money in the world.
If you think BtC isn't being completely controlled by the people who own quite literally all the money in the world, you are either naive, or lying. They created it, they mined it all, and it can be shown that it is mostly held by corporate interests (again, see the link above that shows there is only one single corporation in the world).
Give it up, gold doesn't work.
It's a digital world, a digital battlefield, with digital gold.
You get Bitcoin at the price you deserve, and you're still extremely ignorant... hfsp with Elizabeth Warren and the international bankers that are going to get debt rugged