But there's no harm in calling aapparent for a few hours. By the midnight press conference they called it an assassination attempt.
I have no problem on investigations being led by the facts before coming to conclusions.
I'm not saying this matches the facts of yesterday but an example could be a guy who wanted to do a mass shooting of audience members, but not Trump. Like let's said they found a note from the guy saying his GF dumped him and she and her family were going to be at the rally.
False early conclusions can lead to investigate dead ends and wasted time.
I still don't have an issue with not be definitive on the record immediately.
It's like the 72 hour rule in action.
I mean imagine how much better social media would be if people were sure about things before they spoke.
The FBI doesn't even want to use the word "assassination".
I have doubts.
I don't mind people going slow on investigations like this.
I'd rather get the facts than get bombarded with fake rabbit holes to go down.
Or having to unlearn fake facts.
Press briefing coming up.
It's not ambiguous. It was an attempted assassination. Someone died, others including Trump injured. There is no other way to call it.
But there's no harm in calling aapparent for a few hours. By the midnight press conference they called it an assassination attempt.
I have no problem on investigations being led by the facts before coming to conclusions.
I'm not saying this matches the facts of yesterday but an example could be a guy who wanted to do a mass shooting of audience members, but not Trump. Like let's said they found a note from the guy saying his GF dumped him and she and her family were going to be at the rally.
False early conclusions can lead to investigate dead ends and wasted time.
I still don't have an issue with not be definitive on the record immediately.
It's like the 72 hour rule in action.
I mean imagine how much better social media would be if people were sure about things before they spoke.