New theory where the (second) shooter was positioned, so that the security service had difficulty locating him. From there here could escape quickly. - The Great Awakening

New theory where the (second) shooter was positioned, so that the security service had difficulty locating him. From there here could escape quickly. (twitter.com)

posted 161 days ago by eagle-eyes2020 161 days ago by eagle-eyes2020 +24 / -0

19 comments

19 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (19)

sorted by:

▲ 3 ▼

– eagle-eyes2020 [S] 3 points 161 days ago +3 / -0

Very probably the position is more to the left at the fringe of the tree, bc the shooter has to have free range as well.

But if you have seen the foto with bullet shooting by behind Trump, as well as a foto of his wounded ear and cheek, you have to come to the conclusion that the shooter (second) stood totally in parallel to Trump aiming at middle/back of his head.

By moving his head Trump was only injured slightly and the bullet is seen in a straight line behind him. Which is only possible to be seen bc it is a parallel line behind Trump.

Now look at right picture again and tell me where the second shooter was placed, not to be seen, but free range for him and quick escape!

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 2 ▼

– eagle-eyes2020 [S] 2 points 161 days ago +2 / -0

Bullet: https://x.com/Lukewearechange/status/

Moved his head just in time: https://x.com/VigilantFox/status/1812302980055540132

Position of the 2. Shooter: https://x.com/blkferret/status/1812449528886206523/photo/2

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q