Yesterday, allegedly, a kid with a rifle climbed atop a roof, in plain view of witnesses, and managed to fire off multiple shots at President Trump, from less than 150m away. The world record sniper kill is over 2 miles. A professional would not have missed yesterday. So, if they want Trump gone so badly, why haven't they taken him out? Yesterday showed me that if they wanted him dead, it would not be difficult, at all.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (28)
sorted by:
Respectfully, you are not thinking! What if whether Trump lived or died was secondary to the purpose of the enemy staging the event.
I believe you have missed my point. Clearly my fault, since others seem to not have understood my underlying question as well. It has nothing to do with what happened last night, aside from the fact that we clearly saw Trump is not as well protected as he could or should be.
Do you believe the deep state wants Trump dead, or has wanted him gone at any point in the past 8 years? Regardless of who is in control at this point? I was simply wondering why, if the CIA, FBI, NSA, etc are at least partially corrupted, and the deep state is so blatantly desperate to get rid of Trump, and it seems they would do ANYTHING to maintain control, why have they not managed to actually take him out, when after last night it is clear that there are "holes" in his security.
To simplify it further; is the deep state really so incompetent that despite their seething hatred for Trump, they have not managed to find someone who can take him out, even if it would result in a civil war?
If Trump was efficient taken out by a professional clean hit, it would directly point back to one of those agencies.
Since the hit was not the primary objective, but secondary to the affect the hit manifested, what do they care if the person who committed act can shoot straight of not.
9/11 pointed back to the agencies. Even JFK pointed back to the agencies and half of Americans didn't believe the story at the time. So, when they are back against the wall, about the be exposed and lose their grip on power permanently, why would they not just say fuck it, and take him out, even if it blatantly was an inside job? Surely civil war is preferable to losing control of the globe for them. My original question still remains ignored.
I agree that may be their ultimate step, but everything is done in degrees.