I dont know about the rest of you but i havnt seen a word about the need for gun control after the attempt at Trumps life. Usually after a shooting theres a wave of voices screaming to enact new gun control laws. I wonder why the dems would choose to ignore that talking point in this specific situation. Hmmmm hmmmm i wonder
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (12)
sorted by:
Maybe the ploy was to strike fear into the rinos so they'd lead the charge on an 'assault weapons' ban. Hell, we'll have to see how Trump's opinion on gun rights have been affected by this.
Why would Trump's opinion change? You really think getting shot at by some loony fed soy boy is going to scare Trump into violating the constitution?
Do I needs to remind you about the bump stock ban?
You don't need a bump stock to bump fire, it just makes it easier, and besides, who's appointees overturned that bumpstock ban anyways?
Automatic weapons are already banned unless you have a permit. Trying to find middle ground and gain new support is not the same as a kneejerk reaction and calling for actual gun control that the left wants.