You see a guy with a rifle looking down on the President's rally and don't do shit? Even if he fell off when he ducked down like they say he did, climb the hell back up and come up firing. I know self preservation is strong, but there are times when you have to just let it all hang out and trust that God has your back. You took the damned job, and you are taking the check earn it.
She has already increased SWAT support for President Trump.
Well about time, kind of closing the well after the calf drowned, but We will let her remedial action pass, I guess. She has just handed a huge lesson, and it will be interesting to see how she bears up under intense pressure.
Trump should expand his own security detail as well, TBH, to include a safety-management team that is fully integrated technologically and with a horizontal power structure - i.e. more discretion for agents, not just 'waiting for commands' in 'their ear-pieces' in the old vertical-hierarchy system generated from the 20thC armies - i.e. supervisor has all the power (old) instead of acting like an information hub (new), but the latter leaves discretional decisions to those on the ground. Of course such systems require a huge Trust and Transparency factors. I think Trump knows that. For example the sniper (more elite) had that kid in his sights for ages. (Does anyone know if anyone else was aware of this?) And good on him for reacting to the shots, when they happened. But the failure came when nobody bothered to stand on the podium and look at the vantage points, before Trump climbed on it. Nobody gave an order to run a safety check? Any agent on the ground would have picked the hazard up, if they had been given any discretion to look (But that was not 'their' job? They did not dare to speak up?).
Long story short: The peeps on the ground (not the elite snipers) were treated like cattle and herded by earpiece wallahs. People react to micro-management by following orders to the 'T', so that places blame on the supervisor, poncing about and not passing info around (a lack of integration?), and that removes the ground-wallah's ability to say: 'hey. Did anyone check those roofs?' or 'Is anyone guarding those buildings?', even if they are a new girl.
The local cops were on donut break in that building.
They didn't think to check the roof. Actually one guy did, and was threatened with a gun. (And he didn't raise an alarm?)
You see a guy with a rifle looking down on the President's rally and don't do shit? Even if he fell off when he ducked down like they say he did, climb the hell back up and come up firing. I know self preservation is strong, but there are times when you have to just let it all hang out and trust that God has your back. You took the damned job, and you are taking the check earn it.
Yeah and they accidentally forgot to bring in the ladder too - the coffee was good though
She has already increased SWAT support for President Trump.
Well about time, kind of closing the well after the calf drowned, but We will let her remedial action pass, I guess. She has just handed a huge lesson, and it will be interesting to see how she bears up under intense pressure.
Trump should expand his own security detail as well, TBH, to include a safety-management team that is fully integrated technologically and with a horizontal power structure - i.e. more discretion for agents, not just 'waiting for commands' in 'their ear-pieces' in the old vertical-hierarchy system generated from the 20thC armies - i.e. supervisor has all the power (old) instead of acting like an information hub (new), but the latter leaves discretional decisions to those on the ground. Of course such systems require a huge Trust and Transparency factors. I think Trump knows that. For example the sniper (more elite) had that kid in his sights for ages. (Does anyone know if anyone else was aware of this?) And good on him for reacting to the shots, when they happened. But the failure came when nobody bothered to stand on the podium and look at the vantage points, before Trump climbed on it. Nobody gave an order to run a safety check? Any agent on the ground would have picked the hazard up, if they had been given any discretion to look (But that was not 'their' job? They did not dare to speak up?).
Long story short: The peeps on the ground (not the elite snipers) were treated like cattle and herded by earpiece wallahs. People react to micro-management by following orders to the 'T', so that places blame on the supervisor, poncing about and not passing info around (a lack of integration?), and that removes the ground-wallah's ability to say: 'hey. Did anyone check those roofs?' or 'Is anyone guarding those buildings?', even if they are a new girl.