Who told you that? Some random "expert?" When did we start believing them? How do you even know there was a bullet? Because of a picture? Who showed you that picture? Who had the high speed video running at the exact right moment?
A movie is believable because all of the necessary cues you need to believe it are added into the script. If they are not added into the script we say "there are holes in the script."
Let's assume for a moment that this event was scripted. If there were holes in this script it could destroy the benefits for Trump (of which this event has a metric fuckton). Jessie Smollett's false flag, which would have been beneficial for him if it had succeeded, was destroyed by exactly such holes in the script. I suggest they were put there on purpose. I suggest it is possible to do the opposite, fill in the gaps to make a believable movie.
Do you honestly believe such ad hominems and false groupings help you make your case better?
Not that I mean to suggest you actually made a case. You simply proclaimed an ad hominem, attempted to group me with a group that you think are "automatically wrong", didn't address a single thing I said, and implied "incredulity" at an opinion that differs from your own.
I suggest if you want to make a case to promote your opinion or belief, you should try to actually make one..
I think it is highly likely that the assassination was a white hat scripted event. I have made that case a few dozen times over the past few days. If you wish to see what I have said on the matter, feel free to read my history. Having said that:
if you agree with the leftists
This is a false grouping. It doesn't matter what "group" someone belongs to or may agree with. All that matters is evidence and logic. Attempting to group me with someone you don't like is a fallacious argument (specifically an association fallacy). My argument is my argument and it stands (or doesn't) on it's own. This is true regardless of who else may espouse a similar conclusion.
Association fallacies are among the worst (or at least among the most common fallacies), and are what drive The Matrix. We have been trained to make such fallacious arguments all our lives; in school, in books, in the media, etc.. Unlearning this training is essential to the GA.
Who told you that? Some random "expert?" When did we start believing them? How do you even know there was a bullet? Because of a picture? Who showed you that picture? Who had the high speed video running at the exact right moment?
A movie is believable because all of the necessary cues you need to believe it are added into the script. If they are not added into the script we say "there are holes in the script."
Let's assume for a moment that this event was scripted. If there were holes in this script it could destroy the benefits for Trump (of which this event has a metric fuckton). Jessie Smollett's false flag, which would have been beneficial for him if it had succeeded, was destroyed by exactly such holes in the script. I suggest they were put there on purpose. I suggest it is possible to do the opposite, fill in the gaps to make a believable movie.
A script without holes.
perfectly written and well said!
Yes.
Patriots truly are in control.
So, just like the leftists, you believe the Trump assassination attempt was faked?
Do you honestly believe such ad hominems and false groupings help you make your case better?
Not that I mean to suggest you actually made a case. You simply proclaimed an ad hominem, attempted to group me with a group that you think are "automatically wrong", didn't address a single thing I said, and implied "incredulity" at an opinion that differs from your own.
I suggest if you want to make a case to promote your opinion or belief, you should try to actually make one..
Not making a case at all (why are you adding your own context to my simple question?)
I just want to know if you agree with the leftists we all see on social media claiming that the assassination attempt was faked?
I think it is highly likely that the assassination was a white hat scripted event. I have made that case a few dozen times over the past few days. If you wish to see what I have said on the matter, feel free to read my history. Having said that:
This is a false grouping. It doesn't matter what "group" someone belongs to or may agree with. All that matters is evidence and logic. Attempting to group me with someone you don't like is a fallacious argument (specifically an association fallacy). My argument is my argument and it stands (or doesn't) on it's own. This is true regardless of who else may espouse a similar conclusion.
Association fallacies are among the worst (or at least among the most common fallacies), and are what drive The Matrix. We have been trained to make such fallacious arguments all our lives; in school, in books, in the media, etc.. Unlearning this training is essential to the GA.