Ah, that's reasonable. I thought maybe you were suggesting that DemoRanch needs prove that there is no connection between them and the shooter. Instead, you're suggesting that there could be more info revealed about the shooter or the circumstances around the event. Makes sense to me. I appreciate you taking the time to explain your reasoning. Thanks!
Ah, that's reasonable. I thought maybe you were suggesting that DemoRanch needs prove that there is no connection between them and the shooter. Instead, you're suggesting that there could be more info revealed about the shooter or the circumstances around the event. Makes sense to me. I appreciate you taking the time to explain your reasoning. Thanks!