8kun anon explains the shots; supports the animation that 3 shots went by Trump's head.
(media.greatawakening.win)
🤔💭 Theory 😲💡
Comments (19)
sorted by:
Doesn't actually "explain" anything 🤔
He is responding to John Cullen's hypothesis that there were two shooters and the second one was in the water tower.
See my response to Framus' comment to this post.
Can't make any sense of this haiku or whatever it is. Might be just me. What animation?
Several graphics have been posted, one showing Trump's head turning and three rounds going by. That was the first time it occurred to me that three rounds missed his head.
This is his hypothesis after analyzing the sounds of the gunshots. The first three went by or nicked Trump.
4, 5, 6, 7, 8 intermingled between the shooters, with one he presumes took out the second sniper. The last counter-sniper round took out the roof patsy.
Another analyst of the sounds posted a couple days ago said there were three weapons fired, 3, 5, and 1 respectively. If this is the case, the counter-sniper fired only one round, presumably at the roof guy. [An alternative I have also seen is that the second sniper took out the patsy on the roof.]
The one on the roof fired either 3 or 5, and the second sniper fired either 3 or 5.
8kun anon believes one of the inter-mingled shots took out the second sniper who he calls the water tower guy. It would have to have been the counter-sniper I guess.
I saw two videos on RedPill78's show on Foxhole that seemed to show that shots could have come from behind a curtain at the rear of part of the bleachers. A "grassy knoll" type thing.
I don't have any other source than that, or any links. Were you aware of those videos? They are about the same but one with better resolution than the other.
This 8kun anon presumes the second sniper was on the water tower. I do not presume where the second sniper was. The anon believes the second sniper was farther away based on the sounds of the rounds.
This whole thing is so messed up we may never know for sure, especially with the mighty FBI doing the "investigating".
It is a solvable problem, but we do not know where the bullets or casings ended up, or even the caliber of weapon which fired them.
Those are the things we will never know. I'm sure the 'authorities' will come up with answers but I can all but assure you they will be fake.
They had an FBI guy up on that horribly dangerous slightly sloped roof washing away the blood stains. Any bullet casings are gone or planted, I'm sure.
And now we have some, like 9 billion Keyboard ""Snipers"", coming out of the Woodwork, and just posting the silliest opinions....
1st shot got Trumps ear, then the rest went into the crowd, dude Murdered one Man, and injured 2 others, then he was killed....
The First Three shots came from the Same Gun, that's an easy tell, after that, the Reports from other Guns can be heard....
Is that your analysis of the sequence of shots?
That's the only Logical sequence that shows what happened, I was watching, and at this point, I have it memorized, he Ducked after the First shot, and it makes a very distinct sound when being shot, as an INFANTRYMAN, I have put thousands of rounds down range with an M-16, it's part of my memory almost like breathing, so yeah, I don't simply think it's that specific platform, I know it....
So the first three shots came from the roof?
THANK YOU FOR YOUR SERVICE, and hence expertise.
We anons and the autists have to piece this together, b/c we cannot trust the FIBbers to give us the ballistic info to judge for ourselves. The caliber, the casings, the bullets, the location of those to compute the direction of fire, etc.
What we know even now is not insignificant from the acoustics and shot direction from what is known of the targets. [And I have not seen a lot of armchair snipers out there, but only very few seriously commenting on the direction, number of rounds per weapon, ballistics.]
Thank you for your contribution. We need to evaluate all hypotheses against what is known. The hypothesis that the first three shots came from the same shooter is believable.
Where the "splainin" be at? 🤔
The anon is not writing poetry but describing the series of shots.
https://i.4cdn.org/pol/1721259973155744.jpg
OK I would appreciate a summary of what these diagrams suggest. Thanking in advance!
I don't think there is one... other than studying them and deducing various lines of sight/attack and coverage. It's from the chans...
I get it, but I don't get it! B/C I can't interpret their images!
pol, 4chan, 8chan, 8kun oh how much we learned from 2015 on!