Perhaps because it was such a bare crime scene to begin with??
Like before he got there it was bare roof,
It wasn't like you'd have a lot of history of people going to that spot. Where you'd have to figure out what was from the day of the crime and what just existed there before like the a timeline type of thing. They would have witness statements saying exactly when he climbed on the roof.
Not a lot of carpet to take fibers from. Not a lot of fingerprints that would be relevant. I guess maybe his fingerprints would be relevant.
My guess is the the entirety of evidence is his body and what he brought on the roof, his gun etc. Not a lot of clutter to go through.
Perhaps because it was such a bare crime scene to begin with??
Like before he got there it was bare roof,
It wasn't like you'd have a lot of history of people going to that spot. Where you'd have to figure out what was from the day of the crime and what just existed there before like the a timeline type of thing. They would have witness statements saying exactly when he climbed on the roof.
Not a lot of carpet to take fibers from. Not a lot of fingerprints that would be relevant. I guess maybe his fingerprints would be relevant.
My guess is the the entirety of evidence is his body and what he brought on the roof, his gun etc. Not a lot of clutter to go through.