When he compares the different audios, you see TWO TIMELINES. He's not actually comparing two waveforms here. He is comparing two SCREENSHOTS of waveforms.
That may be so but as long as the scale is the same on both tracks/screenshots, it shouldn't matter whether it was screenshots or actually two tracks. I have used audacity for over a decade, I know how it works.
All the other shots line up perfectly, including the first and last gunshots in the volley. if the first and last match up, why wouldn't all the ones in between? It was another gun in another location, or else it was some other anomaly such as an echo or one of the SS snipers.
He is usuing Audacity to compare waveforms.
But look at the Audacity menu and see how it handles multi track editing.
https://manual.audacityteam.org/man/tutorial_using_multi_track.html
You have one timeline and multiple audio tracks.
This is not what his video shows.
When he compares the different audios, you see TWO TIMELINES. He's not actually comparing two waveforms here. He is comparing two SCREENSHOTS of waveforms.
That may be so but as long as the scale is the same on both tracks/screenshots, it shouldn't matter whether it was screenshots or actually two tracks. I have used audacity for over a decade, I know how it works.
That's the point we can't tell.
All the other shots line up perfectly, including the first and last gunshots in the volley. if the first and last match up, why wouldn't all the ones in between? It was another gun in another location, or else it was some other anomaly such as an echo or one of the SS snipers.