That’s a fuckin long lag time. They led us to believe the CAT immediately got him soon as he shot.
Was he busy scratching his balls, waiting to see Trump go down first? He did, but not because he was dead, but because he was taking cover. I wonder how soon after whoever was behind this thing realized they dropped the ball.
Ooh, his moment of triumph, standing up had to be burning their asses so bad.
This is my theory. There was an open window in the building that the kid was on the roof of. The actual trained and intended assassin was in the building and fired the first three shots, patsy followed with the remaining. One of the videos that was took by the people who were near the building calling out about the shooter on the roof had the first three shots sounding very muffled which would tell me the shooter was inside. No idea what the last shot was. Maybe the DEI SS girl accidently discharging her weapon when she unholstered? 🤪
Also consider, the military has let a few videos out where they are shooting through like 4inch holes in two separate walls. If the first 3 were suppressed and were fired from 15' inside the building, exiting through something like a dryer vent hole, that would really mitigate the audio forensics.
At this point, I am not sure what further analysis can be done, without the casings, bullets, etc. So FBI knows . . . how many weapons, how many each fired, the sequence, in what direction, from where.
We already know there was more than one shooter. The analysis so far of the acoustics etc. seems reasonable and logical. Just not determinative . . . we don't have the physical evidence . . . to prove or disprove . . .
Theres also reports of an unnamed LEO that fired return fire which could be the second volley or third volley. Its difficult to tell anything because our corrrupt piece of shit government tells us nothing and 80% of what they say is always a lie.
so 3 the assassin, 5 the kid, 1 a counter-sniper??
Actually, counter sniper doesn't fire until 10 seconds after shot #9
That’s a fuckin long lag time. They led us to believe the CAT immediately got him soon as he shot.
Was he busy scratching his balls, waiting to see Trump go down first? He did, but not because he was dead, but because he was taking cover. I wonder how soon after whoever was behind this thing realized they dropped the ball.
Ooh, his moment of triumph, standing up had to be burning their asses so bad.
My guess is the kid fired too soon.
This is my theory. There was an open window in the building that the kid was on the roof of. The actual trained and intended assassin was in the building and fired the first three shots, patsy followed with the remaining. One of the videos that was took by the people who were near the building calling out about the shooter on the roof had the first three shots sounding very muffled which would tell me the shooter was inside. No idea what the last shot was. Maybe the DEI SS girl accidently discharging her weapon when she unholstered? 🤪
This is the video, that backs up your theory. The first 3 shots come from the open windows in the building behind and to the right of the kid.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6hTbo6IKSI
Interesting video, and some things to think about.
Makes more sense now, the pac man perimeter was set up,by the deep state,i cant see them relying on the kid.
I've been thinking since day one, that their was another shooter.
Also consider, the military has let a few videos out where they are shooting through like 4inch holes in two separate walls. If the first 3 were suppressed and were fired from 15' inside the building, exiting through something like a dryer vent hole, that would really mitigate the audio forensics.
Could you make a post concerning this?u/FiveDogs
This is a start, watch beginning at 30 min 27 seconds. https://youtu.be/hxLSFLomRjc?feature=shared
Sniper: DEADLIEST Weapon on the Battlefield | Full Episode
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6hTbo6IKSI
Yes first 3 are from the open window in the building behind the kid.
I'm still assessing this AL...
At this point, I am not sure what further analysis can be done, without the casings, bullets, etc. So FBI knows . . . how many weapons, how many each fired, the sequence, in what direction, from where.
We already know there was more than one shooter. The analysis so far of the acoustics etc. seems reasonable and logical. Just not determinative . . . we don't have the physical evidence . . . to prove or disprove . . .
I agree...still looking for more evidence.
Yes I agree. 25 years audio engineer
ThankQ
Theres also reports of an unnamed LEO that fired return fire which could be the second volley or third volley. Its difficult to tell anything because our corrrupt piece of shit government tells us nothing and 80% of what they say is always a lie.