Forensic analysis indicates that up to three weapons were fired at the Trump rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, on Saturday. This suggests that there was more than one shooter. - First three shots came by weapon A - The next five came by weapon B - The final shot was by weapon C - The Great Awakening

Forensic analysis indicates that up to three weapons were fired at the Trump rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, on Saturday. This suggests that there was more than one shooter. - First three shots came by weapon A - The next five came by weapon B - The final shot was by weapon C (twitter.com)

posted 122 days ago by Joys1Daughter 122 days ago by Joys1Daughter +222 / -0

98 comments

98 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (98)

sorted by:

▲ 3 ▼

– God_wins 3 points 122 days ago +3 / -0

At the very beginning of this there was a picture of what appeared to have a hole in trumps suit. Right side chest area. My assumption for years is Trump wears a thicker armour and the media always mocks him for being fat—trying to get him from wearing armour.

Has that picture been debunked or forgot about?

permalink save report block reply

▲ 4 ▼

– Cuetardian 4 points 122 days ago +4 / -0

pretty sure that was debunked as being just a shadow or fold on the female agent's suit sleeve.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 3 ▼

– God_wins 3 points 122 days ago +3 / -0

Thank you.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– Joys1Daughter [S] 1 point 122 days ago +1 / -0

How does a fold look like a circle?

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 2 ▼

– Joys1Daughter [S] 2 points 122 days ago +2 / -0

I haven't seen the photo debunked yet...

Here's my theories:

a drop of blood
POTUS may have taken a hit to his vest. The force may have knocked him down and out of his shoes.

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q