I just don't like when people profess to understand that which they cannot prove and who choose to push less likely explanations over more sensible ones. And perhaps worst of all is when people accuse others who try and make sense of this and propose rational questions about this as "doomers" or not on board with the plan.

I don't have to believe Q is in complete control of absolutely every event that occurs to believe in the plan. We ought to be able to disagree about specific elements of things without facing some inquisition for doing so.

Shooting a bullet 100 whatever yards at another human being is not a 100% predictable event. A sudden wind gust and the bullet hits an inch or two left or right of the intended target. The target coughs or gets stung by a bee and suddenly moves and you have a similar hit or miss. That means I cannot fathom a formulation of Q as anything other than omnipotent that would be willing to risk a shot being allowed to be fired at the President, so I am forced to conclude Q did have have foreknowledge of this specific attempt on the President. If I'm a member of the Q team and have intel about a potential assassin I'm not going to say, "trust the plan, surely God isn't willing to let him die", because that is exactly what is meant by not putting God to the test. Have faith in God, but do not test him.

Am I right? I have no idea, Q hasn't spoken on the matter. Are there other people who look at it differently and believe God personally intervened to project the President? I'm certain there are, but God has not communicated that to me, and I suspect most other people have similarly not been informed. Maybe Trump was. The point is I don't know and I don't appreciate being called a doomer and having to justify my existence here trying to figure out what is going on.