I did read your post. If the water tower shooter fired any rounds, they are not accounted in the known rounds that made impact. All rounds of impact would have been from the building according to the angle of trajectory.
If they admit there was a water tower shooter, then they admit it was a planned assassination and not the act of a lone gunman. So, why should we believe their claims?
According to anyone who has watched the footage and understands what rounds hitting looks like. Look at the position of the tower in relation to Trumps head. Trump would have had to turn around and face the people behind him for his ear to get grazed. Otherwise it would have been a clean headshot at that angle. Why is everyone obsessed with a Watertower shooter? If I was going to take out the former president, I'd use a patsy in the open, on an unprotected roof and have a real shooter inside the building (open window) just behind him. Not on top of a tower were escape is dubious.
The angle of shot from the water tower would not have been able to clip his ear. The open window and the shooters position could have made that shot.
Read my post above again. This was referring to the water tower shooter...
If there was an open window shooter and Crooks missed, then yes ... it's possible.
However, I'm convinced there was a water tower shooter as well, which is why I would be interested in bullet tracing results.
I did read your post. If the water tower shooter fired any rounds, they are not accounted in the known rounds that made impact. All rounds of impact would have been from the building according to the angle of trajectory.
According to who? The FBI? The Secret Service?
If they admit there was a water tower shooter, then they admit it was a planned assassination and not the act of a lone gunman. So, why should we believe their claims?
According to anyone who has watched the footage and understands what rounds hitting looks like. Look at the position of the tower in relation to Trumps head. Trump would have had to turn around and face the people behind him for his ear to get grazed. Otherwise it would have been a clean headshot at that angle. Why is everyone obsessed with a Watertower shooter? If I was going to take out the former president, I'd use a patsy in the open, on an unprotected roof and have a real shooter inside the building (open window) just behind him. Not on top of a tower were escape is dubious.