Okay, I went ahead and did some research into this. It's somewhat ambiguous and will likely need to be an issue taken to the Supreme Court. They need to definitely rule on if a "Naturally Born Citizen" includes those in this particular situation where they would be born with dual citizenship.
The reason WHY the framers made the requirement a "NATURAL BORN Citizen," and not merely a "citizen" was because the entire POINT was that Prez should have no dual allegiance.
Where exactly is that written? Sounds sketchy
Okay, I went ahead and did some research into this. It's somewhat ambiguous and will likely need to be an issue taken to the Supreme Court. They need to definitely rule on if a "Naturally Born Citizen" includes those in this particular situation where they would be born with dual citizenship.
The reason WHY the framers made the requirement a "NATURAL BORN Citizen," and not merely a "citizen" was because the entire POINT was that Prez should have no dual allegiance.
THANK YOU!!!! Tired of saying this.