The U.S. Constitution uses but does not define the phrase "natural born Citizen" and various opinions have been offered over time regarding its exact meaning.

All this stuff reeks of disinfo and distraction to me. Obama is a different case, because there is a fair amount of evidence that his citizenship was actually faked.

But Harris is different, and anyone asserting that "an 'anchor baby' = NOT a natural born citizen" is making an assertion, nothing more.

A natural born citizen refers to someone who was a U.S. citizen at birth, and did not need to go through a naturalization proceeding later in life. Under the 14th Amendment's Naturalization Clause and the Supreme Court case of United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 US. 649, anyone born on U.S. soil and subject to its jurisdiction is a natural born citizen, regardless of parental citizenship.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/natural_born_citizen

The Constitution directly addresses the minimum qualifications necessary to serve as President. In addition to requiring thirty-five years of age and fourteen years of residency, the Constitution limits the presidency to “a natural born Citizen.”1 All the sources routinely used to interpret the Constitution confirm that the phrase “natural born Citizen” has a specific meaning: namely, someone who was a U.S. citizen at birth with no need to go through a naturalization proceeding at some later time.

One tell tale sign that all this fluff about Harris being legally ineligible for the Presidency is disinfo and distraction is this:

"Make sure this is shared everywhere"

Seriously, anons. Sometimes I feel like this board has been dumbed down to marxist dumbness levels. We're better than this.