The fact that Jamaica may have automatically granted Jamaican citizenship to a child of Jamaicans living abroad does not negate that the person may also have another citizenship, including US citizenship.
Every country has their own laws on whether or not a person can hold citizenship in two or more countries. Jamaica accepts dual nationals. Persons interested in becoming citizens of Jamaica should first check to see if their country allows for dual nationality.
As it is, (kek) I think you are dead wrong on this issue, as any and all research that I can do on this even in a short time says that you're wrong.
The laws might be bad, and maybe need to be changed, but just asserting that she's disqualified from being president because her parents had Jamaican citizenship when she was born, aka "an anchor baby", and/or that she herself had Jamaican citizenship at her birth = she does not qualify as a natural born citizen, well, I can find NO basis for that claim in legal cases, SC content, the Constitution or elsewhere.
There is a reason why DJT is a president of law and order, and why law and order are important. Also, the founders set up the constitution so that the representatives of the People would be the ones creating law on behalf of the People. The fact that congress and the government have experienced infiltration and corruption doesn't mean we have to throw out the law.
It means we need to remove the corruption, and then change bad laws.
In my view, the "Harris is ineligible to be President" narrative is disinfo, promoted by clickbaiters who are NOT interested in the facts or research, but rather, in prompting people to react emotionally without really thinking and basing views on evidence. It's a distraction.
This case is quite different to the Obama one, as far as I can see, because there is evidence that Obama's actual citizenship by birth was faked.
The facts around Harris are not disputed. What is disputed is what "natural born citizen" means, and that, as far as I can see, is clear as far as law and precedent go.
There are far more productive and grounded issues to focus on, imo. Far better reasons why Harris isn't qualified to be President. She's eligible. Just not qualified.
reclaim the promise of what it once was and could be again. Thanks again.
I guess I am of the opinion that the US has never lived up to its full potential, because from Day 1 evil has been trying to infiltrate, harass and undermine her.
So, I see what is underway as both a restoration of sorts, but more than that, a clearing of the way for America to become the best she has ever been. Her potential truly unhampered, America can become greater than she ever was.
I'm sort of confident that you'd agree with this, because the patriotic heart originates in the same place. But it's something that has more come in to true focus for me in recent days, after considering the assassination attempt on DJT.
In case you are interested, you could read about my thoughts on that (aka the USA rising to her greater potential to an unprecedented level) here:
And thank you for replying, fren. I have my biases, like everyone, so I'm not a fan of things if I see them as stirring up emotional reactionism instead of critical thinking and research, but that is MY bias and view. I appreciate the reply and the effort at discussion. A blessing on your day.
The USA allows dual citizenship.
https://au.usembassy.gov/dual-nationality/
The fact that Jamaica may have automatically granted Jamaican citizenship to a child of Jamaicans living abroad does not negate that the person may also have another citizenship, including US citizenship.
https://www.pica.gov.jm/citizenship/dual-citizenship
Do you even research, bro?
Thank you for the reply.
As it is, (kek) I think you are dead wrong on this issue, as any and all research that I can do on this even in a short time says that you're wrong.
The laws might be bad, and maybe need to be changed, but just asserting that she's disqualified from being president because her parents had Jamaican citizenship when she was born, aka "an anchor baby", and/or that she herself had Jamaican citizenship at her birth = she does not qualify as a natural born citizen, well, I can find NO basis for that claim in legal cases, SC content, the Constitution or elsewhere.
There is a reason why DJT is a president of law and order, and why law and order are important. Also, the founders set up the constitution so that the representatives of the People would be the ones creating law on behalf of the People. The fact that congress and the government have experienced infiltration and corruption doesn't mean we have to throw out the law.
It means we need to remove the corruption, and then change bad laws.
In my view, the "Harris is ineligible to be President" narrative is disinfo, promoted by clickbaiters who are NOT interested in the facts or research, but rather, in prompting people to react emotionally without really thinking and basing views on evidence. It's a distraction.
This case is quite different to the Obama one, as far as I can see, because there is evidence that Obama's actual citizenship by birth was faked.
The facts around Harris are not disputed. What is disputed is what "natural born citizen" means, and that, as far as I can see, is clear as far as law and precedent go.
There are far more productive and grounded issues to focus on, imo. Far better reasons why Harris isn't qualified to be President. She's eligible. Just not qualified.
I guess I am of the opinion that the US has never lived up to its full potential, because from Day 1 evil has been trying to infiltrate, harass and undermine her.
So, I see what is underway as both a restoration of sorts, but more than that, a clearing of the way for America to become the best she has ever been. Her potential truly unhampered, America can become greater than she ever was.
I'm sort of confident that you'd agree with this, because the patriotic heart originates in the same place. But it's something that has more come in to true focus for me in recent days, after considering the assassination attempt on DJT.
In case you are interested, you could read about my thoughts on that (aka the USA rising to her greater potential to an unprecedented level) here:
https://greatawakening.win/p/17teSZzYQT/2024-july-13--who-was-in-control/
And thank you for replying, fren. I have my biases, like everyone, so I'm not a fan of things if I see them as stirring up emotional reactionism instead of critical thinking and research, but that is MY bias and view. I appreciate the reply and the effort at discussion. A blessing on your day.