If Kamala Harris is determined to be ineligible to replace Joe Biden (should he be deceased), would that mean President Mike Johnson? - The Great Awakening

123

If Kamala Harris is determined to be ineligible to replace Joe Biden (should he be deceased), would that mean President Mike Johnson?

posted 117 days ago by electricbroth1 117 days ago by electricbroth1 +123 / -0

Kamala is an anchor baby, "Joe Biden" may already be dead, and SOTH Mike Johnson is next in the chain of succession. Hmmm...

38 comments

38 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (38)

sorted by:

▲ 1 ▼

– electricbroth1 [S] 1 point 117 days ago +1 / -0

I think it would be Schumer.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– Volpina 1 point 117 days ago +1 / -0

He is not in position

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– electricbroth1 [S] 1 point 117 days ago +1 / -0

I saw elsewhere that it would be Sen. Patty Murray of WA. "Patricia Lynn Murray is an American politician and president pro tempore of the United States Senate since 2023 and the senior United States Senator from Washington since 1993."

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 2 ▼

– villageidiot22 2 points 117 days ago +2 / -0

As president pro tempore of the Senate, she is currently third in the United States presidential line of succession. Murray is also the current chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee.

Murray is the first woman, and 33rd senator overall, to have cast 10,000 votes in the Senate, having reached the threshold on April 20, 2023.[11]

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q