LOL. HELL YES. That was the most statistically significant poll of all. Over 1/4million responses. Most polls have 3-5k. This one was from a democrat hyper-biased cuckboi … and Trump, last I saw, had 70+%. That sample size makes a ‘p-value’ near zero with an R value in the high 90s. Thats damned near exact.
As a retire research scientist I was by extension a total statsfag. These polls they are publishing are beyond fraudulent. I am sure it is not a crime, but I can tell you from EXPERIENCE, their ‘observation gathering’ violates every professional standard there is. I would not be shocked to discover they are recycling, repurposing previous ‘polling expeditions’ and substituting names then calling it a ‘valid’ poll.
These polls are bullshit. I will take a twatter poll with 200K respondents all day long over any of those other bullshit, bought and paid for hacks.
Lines up with the results of the X poll by Krassenstein.
LOL. HELL YES. That was the most statistically significant poll of all. Over 1/4million responses. Most polls have 3-5k. This one was from a democrat hyper-biased cuckboi … and Trump, last I saw, had 70+%. That sample size makes a ‘p-value’ near zero with an R value in the high 90s. Thats damned near exact.
He’s redoing the poll because he didn’t like the results or the ratio lol.
😂😂🤣🤣😂
He has to block about 200,000 accounts first 😂😂😂
Like this crap: https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-may-drop-jd-vance-nikki-haley-ex-clinton-adviser-says-1930495
As a retire research scientist I was by extension a total statsfag. These polls they are publishing are beyond fraudulent. I am sure it is not a crime, but I can tell you from EXPERIENCE, their ‘observation gathering’ violates every professional standard there is. I would not be shocked to discover they are recycling, repurposing previous ‘polling expeditions’ and substituting names then calling it a ‘valid’ poll.
These polls are bullshit. I will take a twatter poll with 200K respondents all day long over any of those other bullshit, bought and paid for hacks.
Agree. They lie about the oversampling and the methodologies as well. << Son of a Research Statistician