BOOOOOOOM!!!
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (47)
sorted by:
That being said....
I am beginning to feel like the hearings are doing their best to sell J13 as a lone gunman event...
So there maybe as many as 3/4 guns being involved as shown by audio evidence...
Blood from a unknown was located inside the building Crook's was on top off.
A van seen under the water tower in earlier in the day on video was found ditched ten miles away filled with explosives, we are told. The detonator was found next to Crooks.
The van is registered to a arms company owned by a family whos name is Yerick (spelled wrong perhaps) and /pol/ 4chan was telling folks to be on the look out for Micheal/Maxwell who hasn't been seen since J13 either.
Speculation...second shooter in the window was also clipped enough to bleed but exited the area in the dumped van.
In any case...holes must be punched in the lone gunman theory in real time. Or they will claim all this was about one sad man acting alone.
The best evidence of more than one shooter is the audio signature that is consistent across multiple different recordings from multiple different locations.
First there were three muffled shots fired from Gun A and Location A, followed by about five unmuffled shots fired in a burst from Gun B at Location B, then a third gunshot fired from Gun C and Location C.
After that about ten seconds go by, and then there is a fourth shot, which appears to be the sniper counter-shot that killed Crooks.
The difference between Gun A and Gun B is very distinct (muffled/unmuffled, different pitch) and the different timing in the echo suggests different locations.
The first three muffled shots all appear to have been at Trump, and the second burst appear to have been more in his general direction, hitting the crowd.
The body on the roof (probably Crooks) only had one gun beside it so it doesn’t seem likely that he could have fired two different guns.
I know they say there were eight shell casings near Crooks, but I believe that is a lie. First because Cheatle refused to commit to an initial number, and second because when they did first answer, they used vague language: the area, the vicinity.