If this is a fake story, and I think it is... they are measuring how vulnerable we are to such manipulation. 35%? 05%?
Logically, nobody's carrying a camera that is that high speed. Validity dead right there. I don't think such a cell phone camera even exists... anyone know of one? Who just happened to be there and take this shot with such an expensive and rare camera.
.... riiiight. Just sit this one out until some verifiable evidence surfaces... and it should.
That wasn't a high speed video camera though, it was a still camera that takes quick bursts of photos, one of which captured a bullet. Very different from high speed video.
Exactly. Looking at John Cullens video, each frame the "bullet" seems to be only moving several inches, maybe a foot or two depending on the angle of approach. It's way too slow to be a bullet.
If this is a fake story, and I think it is... they are measuring how vulnerable we are to such manipulation. 35%? 05%?
Logically, nobody's carrying a camera that is that high speed. Validity dead right there. I don't think such a cell phone camera even exists... anyone know of one? Who just happened to be there and take this shot with such an expensive and rare camera.
.... riiiight. Just sit this one out until some verifiable evidence surfaces... and it should.
Their was a super high speed camera that recorded the other shot,were we saw a streak. It was a NYT photographer if I remember right.
That wasn't a high speed video camera though, it was a still camera that takes quick bursts of photos, one of which captured a bullet. Very different from high speed video.
A .308 moves at 2250 fps. At 60 fps on a camera that's 37.5 feet between images.
Exactly. Looking at John Cullens video, each frame the "bullet" seems to be only moving several inches, maybe a foot or two depending on the angle of approach. It's way too slow to be a bullet.