Now, they are also telling us that it's not real, set up by a vegan to persuade people from meat eating, but the website and everything looks legit. Make your own decision on this.
Most people do go out of their way to help animals that they see suffering.
Most people do already ascribe to vegan or vegan-like ethics. In other words, if they were faced with a choice between having to kill an animal for food or eat a healthy beans-and-rice-and-veggies meal, most people would choose not to kill the animal.
Most people have an "avoid-causing-suffering" point of view. However, they live in a way that is inconsistent with their true values. The world has taught them various ways to overlook this conflict, by 1.) training them to see specific animals as products for their use or consumption, and 2.) hiding how their choices cause so much suffering
Most people who consume animal products want to avoid thinking about these moral conflicts. They want to continue doing what they've been doing and what everyone around them is doing. Having to think about this discrepancy can make them angry (that old cognitive dissonance we all know so well).
The more people spend time thinking about these ideas, the more likely they are to come to the same conclusion. Given the chance, they can easily discover that our society is hypocritical about how we treat animals, that something needs to change.
Because we believe the above, it means we aren't afraid that our approach will make people more likely to eat dogs.
Sure, there's always the teeniest chance we could make people more nihilistic and more uncaring than they already are. But we believe most people really do love animals (especially dogs) and they want to reduce animal suffering––they just don't know how.
Now, they are also telling us that it's not real, set up by a vegan to persuade people from meat eating, but the website and everything looks legit. Make your own decision on this.
This site is based on these ideas:
Most people do go out of their way to help animals that they see suffering.
Most people do already ascribe to vegan or vegan-like ethics. In other words, if they were faced with a choice between having to kill an animal for food or eat a healthy beans-and-rice-and-veggies meal, most people would choose not to kill the animal.
Most people have an "avoid-causing-suffering" point of view. However, they live in a way that is inconsistent with their true values. The world has taught them various ways to overlook this conflict, by 1.) training them to see specific animals as products for their use or consumption, and 2.) hiding how their choices cause so much suffering
Most people who consume animal products want to avoid thinking about these moral conflicts. They want to continue doing what they've been doing and what everyone around them is doing. Having to think about this discrepancy can make them angry (that old cognitive dissonance we all know so well).
The more people spend time thinking about these ideas, the more likely they are to come to the same conclusion. Given the chance, they can easily discover that our society is hypocritical about how we treat animals, that something needs to change.
Because we believe the above, it means we aren't afraid that our approach will make people more likely to eat dogs.
Sure, there's always the teeniest chance we could make people more nihilistic and more uncaring than they already are. But we believe most people really do love animals (especially dogs) and they want to reduce animal suffering––they just don't know how.
https://www.elwooddogmeat.com/about
Thank you. I knew they were not operating here in U.S. I saw the countries.