Just a Reminder that the Deep States Lies and the REASON they Lie to us is NOTHING NEW !!🤡🌎
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (49)
sorted by:
When new claims emerge that contradict the accounts of thousands of eyewitnesses, it's critical to assess these claims with a healthy dose of skepticism. Disregarding firsthand accounts and overwhelming evidence in favor of later, non-forensic theories is not a rational approach. Instead, it's more logical to question the validity of the contradictory opinion rather than dismiss the consistent and corroborated testimonies of those who witnessed the event firsthand.
To disregard the substantial body of evidence and eyewitness accounts in favor of speculative theories is to undermine the principles of critical thinking and evidence-based reasoning.
lol WHAT substantial body of evidence?? all we have are a few people who say they saw a plane. that is all the evidence you're going off. Ironic to use the word 'substantial' when its all just people talking.
Thousands of eyewitnesses, along with video evidence, provide substantial proof that planes hit the towers on 9/11. When thousands of people all corroborate the same event, and their accounts are supported by extensive video footage and forensic analysis, this constitutes strong, compelling evidence.
Dismissing this overwhelming body of firsthand accounts and visual documentation in favor of later, unsubstantiated theories is not a rational approach. The consistent testimonies of eyewitnesses, reinforced by video and forensic evidence, form a robust basis for understanding what occurred. It's important to critically evaluate all claims, but it's also crucial to recognize the weight of direct, corroborated evidence when assessing historical events.
"thousands" is pretty vague. have you heard from thousands? can you verify those? does that include the eyewitnesses that say there were no planes?
people see and hear and remember all kinds of things in a crisis. even when they aren't being given a narrative to support.
the videos you are citing were proved to have been withheld from the public, and modified before release. what reason do you propose for that modification??
haven't got a leg to stand on, fren. best come to terms with it.
Well I guess fortunately for me, I'm not the one with the burden of proof. Just like a flat earther, you are the one with the burden. So. Prove it with forensic level evidence that proves no planes hit the towers, this proof should be trying enough to make the 1000s of eye witnesses questionable.