BREAKING: A 55-year-old woman from near Chester has been arrested on suspicion of a number of offences relating to a social media post containing inaccurate information about the identity of the Southport attacker, Cheshire Police has said. - The Great Awakening

BREAKING: A 55-year-old woman from near Chester has been arrested on suspicion of a number of offences relating to a social media post containing inaccurate information about the identity of the Southport attacker, Cheshire Police has said. (twitter.com) 🤢 These people are sick! 🤮

posted 115 days ago by LakotaPride 115 days ago by LakotaPride +147 / -0

35 comments

35 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (35)

sorted by:

▲ 1 ▼

– dominickmilford 1 point 115 days ago +1 / -0

Nonsense.

Arresting people for sharing news articles that contained ~~incorrect~~ dangerous (mis/dis/mal) information has always been a pillar of Our Democracy. 🤡☠

[One of the best points to come out of the Twitter Files saga, when SO CALLED JOURNALISTS Shellenberger and Taibbi testified - I forget but I believe Taibbi said it.]

Is it now ILLEGAL to have an OPINION that is wrong or incorrect?

Terrifyingly, the answer appears to be YES. JUST LOVE these boot licker Statist anchors passing it off as normal and not completely sociopathic, as well. "It's a reminder to us that we are all accountable for what we say." Mmm, yes, very free and open society, where every day speech is criminal if it is not what BIG BROTHER told us. Removing all those potential violences that it caused, in the name of DEMOCRACY™️

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q