I'm not a fan of massive leaps of logic when it comes to Q proofs. For starters, we're YEARS beyond needing proofs.
Only using time as a basis for assuming a Q proof has happened is flawed. Certainly, every time stamp on Trump's posts doesn't directly correspond to a Q post.
Based on nothing other than 1717, this supposed decode suggests that Q is directly telling anons that assassination attempts are just for optics.
Even if that is true, what is the upside of notifying anons of this? (there is none)
What is the potential downside? What happens if it becomes common knowledge that Trump's assassination attempts are fake?
Zero upside for us to argue that point, and zero upside for Q to even hint at it. Whatever benefits gained by planning such a thing would be lost with broadcasting that it's fake.
Assume, like I do, that Q is real.
I'm not a fan of massive leaps of logic when it comes to Q proofs. For starters, we're YEARS beyond needing proofs.
Only using time as a basis for assuming a Q proof has happened is flawed. Certainly, every time stamp on Trump's posts doesn't directly correspond to a Q post.
Based on nothing other than 1717, this supposed decode suggests that Q is directly telling anons that assassination attempts are just for optics.
Even if that is true, what is the upside of notifying anons of this? (there is none)
What is the potential downside? What happens if it becomes common knowledge that Trump's assassination attempts are fake?
Zero upside for us to argue that point, and zero upside for Q to even hint at it. Whatever benefits gained by planning such a thing would be lost with broadcasting that it's fake.
Yeah this is a reach. Those bullets were not for optics on 7/13