WEEEEELLLLL.....this case is headed to the Supreme Court!!!!!! What this court just did was TRY to NOT follow the US Constitution...The Second Amendment is there for a reason!!!!!!
I would hazard a guess that these "judges" will be finding themselves out of a job(s) after January 5th...Also, their names will be going down in infamy for ALL to see!!!!!
A rule needs to be implemented that if you are part of multiple unconstitutional rulings that are overturned by higher courts you are dismissed without any pension or benefits and are no longer allowed to be employed in the legal field. If they know there are consequences, they will follow the Constitution.
If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; [..]
[..]They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both;
And now comes the big kahuna burger:
and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap ( arrest, detention?), aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill (Swat teams be on alert!), they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.
But that is for conspiracy, like those judges .....and all who act pursuant to their finding.
Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom (opinion?), willfully (knowingly!!!!!) subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States,
Note here, that it is not that the laws supersede the Constitution, but the only test here is whether a right, enjoyment of a right or exercise of a right is secured or protected by the Constitution ....
So what does the Constitution say?
2nd:
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Put differently:
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State,
the right of the people to keep and bear Arms
is protected or secured by these words: shall not be infringed
They just have violated their oath of office and assaulted the Constitution. Treason!
WEEEEELLLLL.....this case is headed to the Supreme Court!!!!!! What this court just did was TRY to NOT follow the US Constitution...The Second Amendment is there for a reason!!!!!!
I would hazard a guess that these "judges" will be finding themselves out of a job(s) after January 5th...Also, their names will be going down in infamy for ALL to see!!!!!
I agree eagle!
What authority do they have for this? And what would make a citizen comply? You aint disarming SHIT (if it were me.)
Come. And. Take. It.
At what point does the Supreme Court say STOP BRINGING THE GUN SHIT TO US!!!!!!!! READ THE CONSTITUTION....SHALL NOT INFRINGE.
https://twstalker.com/mrddmia/status/1822296991893737719
Look on the bright side. A few more tyrants have been exposed. The future isn't bright for tyrants.
Exactly.
Disarming people sounds like being an accessory to murder.
Not going to happen.
A rule needs to be implemented that if you are part of multiple unconstitutional rulings that are overturned by higher courts you are dismissed without any pension or benefits and are no longer allowed to be employed in the legal field. If they know there are consequences, they will follow the Constitution.
I like this Nitro!
Mental disorders like these judges display have shown great responses to adequate doses of plumbum.
Do not comply. It really is that simple.
18 USC 241/242 ......
And now comes the big kahuna burger:
But that is for conspiracy, like those judges .....and all who act pursuant to their finding.
Note here, that it is not that the laws supersede the Constitution, but the only test here is whether a right, enjoyment of a right or exercise of a right is secured or protected by the Constitution ....
So what does the Constitution say?
2nd:
Put differently:
is protected or secured by these words: shall not be infringed
They just have violated their oath of office and assaulted the Constitution. Treason!