Amanda Grace is regarded by many as a reliable prophet; In any case, what she is saying concerning the debate being a setup (that he can beat) is plausible, I think, and worthy of prayer for DJT leading up to them. - The Great Awakening

Amanda Grace is regarded by many as a reliable prophet; In any case, what she is saying concerning the debate being a setup (that he can beat) is plausible, I think, and worthy of prayer for DJT leading up to them. (youtu.be)

posted 89 days ago by 5757 89 days ago by 5757 +29 / -2

10 comments

10 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (10)

sorted by:

▲ 6 ▼

– MilitaryJustice 6 points 89 days ago +8 / -2

Be careful of false prophets see here

permalink save report block reply

▲ 3 ▼

– thelordismyshepherd 3 points 89 days ago +3 / -0

Amen!

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– enough_of_the_racism 1 point 89 days ago +1 / -0

I find people like to test the spirit on their own interpretation and timeline, and don’t account for God’s timeline. I’ll have to watch this all the way through, but I skimmed the 10 - 13 minute marks. (I realize I’ve only watched 2% of this). She is talked about they won’t succeed in stealing the election. He is saying they did and therefore she is a false profit. But the prophecy could be for 2024. And in reality they didn’t succeed because Trump invoked the Insurrection Act and the military is in charge. Q talks in vague timelines all the time, and God can do that too. I’ll have to find time to watch the rest and get all the info.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– MilitaryJustice 1 point 89 days ago +1 / -0

Spoiler:

She is wrong about everything she says
Her platform is heavily financed and monetized by making these false prophesies to a large subscriber base
She has duped a lot of people who clearly lack biblical discernment

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q