Yes, I heard that at the very beginning of all this, but in all the body cam videos, you don’t see any of the officers cut their hands, even the one that got partially up on roof and saw Crooks didn’t hurt his hands where he was bleeding, and he is the one I assumed did because of what that officer said about an officer hurting his hands climbing up on the roof. And you would think they would have shown the officer who hurt his hands, but haven’t seen anything yet. I’m not saying that it isn’t true, it could very well be true, it’s just we haven’t seen any evidence of it yet.
I agree. Everything is as clear as mud still. Although, my current opinion is that Crooks fired the first 3 shots. Unidentified other shooter in the same building fired the rapid 5 shots and then 52 seconds later came the counter-sniper shot that took out Crooks the Patsy.
Did you read to the end of the article? Says an "officer cut his hands and might need stitches and that probably explains the blood in the bathroom."
Yes, I heard that at the very beginning of all this, but in all the body cam videos, you don’t see any of the officers cut their hands, even the one that got partially up on roof and saw Crooks didn’t hurt his hands where he was bleeding, and he is the one I assumed did because of what that officer said about an officer hurting his hands climbing up on the roof. And you would think they would have shown the officer who hurt his hands, but haven’t seen anything yet. I’m not saying that it isn’t true, it could very well be true, it’s just we haven’t seen any evidence of it yet.
I agree. Everything is as clear as mud still. Although, my current opinion is that Crooks fired the first 3 shots. Unidentified other shooter in the same building fired the rapid 5 shots and then 52 seconds later came the counter-sniper shot that took out Crooks the Patsy.