2
MyAquaEyes 2 points ago +2 / -0

I love his "Bunker" episodes the most. Too funny!

1
MyAquaEyes 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not believe. Know. Why should it bother you so much? It's my business, not yours.

1
MyAquaEyes 1 point ago +1 / -0

Luckily, reasoning has nothing to do with my absolute knowledge that there is a loving Heavenly Father who is always there and his son, Jesus Christ, who is my exemplar. I know this to be true.

1
MyAquaEyes 1 point ago +1 / -0

I know that Trump won, but I am unfamiliar with the aspects of the case. I will try to find them out and come back to you here with information.

9
MyAquaEyes 9 points ago +9 / -0

Potassium. My mother had seizures due to her body not being able to absorb potassium efficiently. It had to do with her kidneys too.

2
MyAquaEyes 2 points ago +2 / -0

By released, do you mean to the public? I am not an attorney, but I have learned a few things through the decades of following lawyers and court cases. The election fraud evidence WAS submitted to many courts, but most of the courts refused to hear the case saying it was due to no legal standing. They never saw the evidence and didn't rule on the merits of the cases. The 3 or so courts that did hear it, Trump won 2 of those cases. But because this evidence is still subject to being presented as discovery in future cases, it cannot be released to the public. As you know, best practice is to not release your evidence outside of a court. Sometimes the public finds out about the evidentiary details after those details have been presented in court.or if someone leaks it (this causes problems)...in a case that is being HEARD. But If there are any pending court cases, the evidence cannot be released. Chain of custody, tainting the jury pool and other concerns about evidence being in the public. I feel that there is massive evidence that we may not even fathom. 2000 mules was an anecdotal display of how it was done and that it is known. But imagine how much evidence there is for elections across every county in the US. Massive.

1
MyAquaEyes 1 point ago +1 / -0

The same way it was stopped in 2016.

1
MyAquaEyes 1 point ago +2 / -1

Because evidence MUST have a verified chain of possession before it can be entered into discovery in a court case. If it is just released to the public, there is no way to ensure chain of possession.

3
MyAquaEyes 3 points ago +3 / -0

Be cool if this was secretly Trump's pick all along...

1
MyAquaEyes 1 point ago +7 / -6

Yes, everyone who is alive is actually dead and those that are dead are actually, secretly alive....

1
MyAquaEyes 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm waiting to see some AI art that looks good.

1
MyAquaEyes 1 point ago +1 / -0

They may be "better" but they still lack heart, soul and emotion which is the biggest part of creation.

2
MyAquaEyes 2 points ago +2 / -0

Less than ten. But require two hands, so more than five.

1
MyAquaEyes 1 point ago +1 / -0

Those are utilities, and though they were created, they are not art.

1
MyAquaEyes 1 point ago +1 / -0

No. There is creativity in good photography.

26
MyAquaEyes 26 points ago +26 / -0

Let me repeat myself. When there is gridlock in DC, Americans keep more of their money and more of their liberty.

view more: Next ›