Everyone knows Wikipedia is a tool of the Left. - It scrubbed JD Vance's medals from his prior service with the Marine Corps
(twitter.com)
🤢 These people are sick! 🤮
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (19)
sorted by:
So none, then.
It would be just as easy for liberals to accuse Wikipedia of the exact same thing.
If you think it's something they do and they do it often, it would be easy to provide examples.
First, I was talking about Wikipedia only. I never brought up MSM or Google or CNN and the only reason you're doing so is to muddy the message. And what the hell does it matter where I was during covid?
Second, it's not the sign of a rational being to view things in such concrete black and white. You're trying to argue that because Wikipedia (among others) are not 100% perfect it means that what you claim about them (they're run by leftists/favor libs/whatever) is true. That's not how reality works.
Third, you still haven't posted anything that supports your claims. Over six hours since this conversation and still nothing. It would be much faster, easier, and actually effective if you would just post whatever you can to support your claims. But you won't, because you can't, because you didn't have anything that pointed to your claims other than what you just felt like believing. And you'll continue to waste time and effort going around in circles arguing because you're just not emotionally capable of accepting you might be wrong about something. YOU are the one wasting time here.
I'm not forcing you to respond to my comments.
It's not my problem if you're not capable of controlling your own behavior and I'm not going to censor myself to make you happy.
It's also not the mark of a rational person to just jump to the conclusion that someone has an entirely different political viewpoint than you do just because you don't agree with them on something.
Who are "they"? The people who edited his page? As in, basically anyone, which was my entire point to begin with?
Or if that is not who you were talking about, who are "they"?
I just wanted to take this opportunity to clarify why I made these posts here.
It's because of exactly what u/24Tango mentioned here. What is going on with some of these Wikipedia entries.
First, many here really do seem clueless on how Wikipedia works. They have no idea that they can edit pages. Why does this matter? Because we need to have everyone we can making edits as needed. Just look at the edit history of Robert Malone's page as mentioned and you will see why that is important.
Second, it's not just that people need to make edits, but they need to make sure those edits are backed up with sources. This is why I ask people for evidence of things they claim and I point out huge, gaping holes in their logic. Because, sadly, not everyone is good at making good arguments. And that's what we need to be doing.
So we can either throw out the victim card and whine that Wikipedia likes liberals more than us, or we can remove our thumbs from our asses by learning about what we're talking about and learning how to make solid arguments and then actually doing it.
But some people must just like how it feels to have their thumbs up their ass, because they fight like hell to iustify doing it. 🤷♀️