The case was SO sculpted that the defense could not bring up anything about Dominion. It was clearly lawfare.
The problem is with the use of machines for voting. Particularly outsourced black box machines with software owned by other actors. The elected officials do not know what they are really doing when they follow the instructions from these actors.
Remember how they redefine words?
"Trusted Build".
On the bright side, incredible boomerang precedent was set in this case for use against those who "deceive and plot (plan) with others."
There could be another lawsuit coming in this showing the deception and plotting between SoS and Dominion.
It is my hope that this case is studied by experts and truly described in all its features. (Flipping witnesses, sculpted scope of the charges, Defense legal abilities, use of objections, young judges, etc.)
I keep wondering if just a couple of circumstances were different how this case would have gone. Like, if the county was required to provide the IT tech guy to do the before and after images.
And, and if there was a badge issued to the county clerk that was a temporary badge without a name on it. Such things exist in the corporate world, if I remember correctly.
The case was SO sculpted that the defense could not bring up anything about Dominion. It was clearly lawfare.
The problem is with the use of machines for voting. Particularly outsourced black box machines with software owned by other actors. The elected officials do not know what they are really doing when they follow the instructions from these actors.
Remember how they redefine words?
"Trusted Build".
On the bright side, incredible boomerang precedent was set in this case for use against those who "deceive and plot (plan) with others."
There could be another lawsuit coming in this showing the deception and plotting between SoS and Dominion.
It is my hope that this case is studied by experts and truly described in all its features. (Flipping witnesses, sculpted scope of the charges, Defense legal abilities, use of objections, young judges, etc.)
I keep wondering if just a couple of circumstances were different how this case would have gone. Like, if the county was required to provide the IT tech guy to do the before and after images.
And, and if there was a badge issued to the county clerk that was a temporary badge without a name on it. Such things exist in the corporate world, if I remember correctly.