There is a reason why everything including Election 2020, Vaccines, Epstein files, RussiaGate, U1 and even 9/11 disclosures,Trump assassination plot etc seem to be converging together at this point. Some of these things dragged on for years. Others just happening. Yet everything line up neatly.
It can only mean one thing. They want all this info to come out after we are in the precipice and people are actively looking for answers, which is precisely when they will find the will to change.
Precipice -> Full Disclosure -> Great Awakening
As for what leads to precipice? The deep state's reaction to knowing that 2024 elections cannot be stolen is going to be what leads to precipice.
At the time of the precipice - people need the information already available, so releasing it before can be a better timing.
Full Disclosure -> Precipice -> Great Awakening
Don’t be too fixated on one scenario:
“… will only happen …”
“… It can only mean …”
Q can surprise us.
The election topic makes sense and I can partially agree. A full disclosure is easier when Trump is officially in the office in Jan 2025. He also said in one interview that something will be discussed on day 1 in the office.
The above doesn’t mean that the disclosure cannot start earlier triggered by someone else waiting for the right timing (as many “miracles” that we see happening here and there).
To summarise: I see your sequence as likely, but I can’t say it’s the only way.
Have to disagree with this. Yes, this would have been the case if it happened under Trump but if it happens now, there are many ways for the Cabal to squash it without taking us to the precipice.
Precipice is an event, not information.
At the time of the precipice - people need the information already available, so releasing it before can be a better timing.
From experience we can see that information already released, even a week ago, is already old news and does not have the same impact as a newly released information to a captive audience.
Drop 4407 says nothing about disclosure.
I think you’re over interpreting. Especially when you’re suggesting will only happen.
https://qalerts.app/?n=4407
Disclosure can happen way before the precipice and can actually lead to the precipice (disclosure + deep state reaction to it).
There is a reason why everything including Election 2020, Vaccines, Epstein files, RussiaGate, U1 and even 9/11 disclosures,Trump assassination plot etc seem to be converging together at this point. Some of these things dragged on for years. Others just happening. Yet everything line up neatly.
It can only mean one thing. They want all this info to come out after we are in the precipice and people are actively looking for answers, which is precisely when they will find the will to change.
Precipice -> Full Disclosure -> Great Awakening
As for what leads to precipice? The deep state's reaction to knowing that 2024 elections cannot be stolen is going to be what leads to precipice.
Maybe yes, maybe not.
The below also makes (even more?) sense:
Releasing it earlier can lead to the precipice.
At the time of the precipice - people need the information already available, so releasing it before can be a better timing.
Full Disclosure -> Precipice -> Great Awakening
Don’t be too fixated on one scenario:
“… will only happen …”
“… It can only mean …”
Q can surprise us.
The election topic makes sense and I can partially agree. A full disclosure is easier when Trump is officially in the office in Jan 2025. He also said in one interview that something will be discussed on day 1 in the office.
The above doesn’t mean that the disclosure cannot start earlier triggered by someone else waiting for the right timing (as many “miracles” that we see happening here and there).
To summarise: I see your sequence as likely, but I can’t say it’s the only way.
Have to disagree with this. Yes, this would have been the case if it happened under Trump but if it happens now, there are many ways for the Cabal to squash it without taking us to the precipice.
Precipice is an event, not information.
From experience we can see that information already released, even a week ago, is already old news and does not have the same impact as a newly released information to a captive audience.