Of course, there are a lot of interesting aspects to consider. Your further elaboration raises a few questions. How do you know Musk is a genius? What kind of a genius? And how do you know this for a fact?

What premises do you use to determine these answers?

A mind can ask a lot more questions.

who does what when with what means against what costs and yield?

That is a question of value, as it helps to analyze a certain event or object.

Example:
Is it possible navel lint is a high yield resource?
Is it possible dick cheese can cure cancer?

Of course it is ..... possible. What are the probabilities of that?

Do you see the difference between a closed: is it possible question, and a inquiring open question? (see also the Socratic method)

In comes determinism.

Just posing a question out of the blue, does not mean the question is helpful or even reminiscent of an open mind. Especially, when combined with the lack of background, it rather provides for another direction that poses a distraction.

The question you posed is not a new question. Did you check the answers to previous iterations of this question?

this question has been posed before, Redtoe_skipper?

Yes .... check the sidebar to your right (desktop) or hop over to searchvoat.co either Greatawakening or QRV.

It may be helpful to study the answers to the earlier iterations of that same question, as the method and means for analysis are being discussed.

Based on that input, and using the things you learned, you may pose the same question and provide your own analysis and estimation. That then may or may not hold water on further inspection and testing. But at least, you are your own energy in your own question.

This, for now, constitutes my rebuttal to your question and elaboration.