Would anyone be interested in learning how to make better arguments in support of Q?

I've been thinking about this for a while, and I believe it could really help in convincing normies.

To clarify, I'm not trying to criticize anyone or present myself as a great debater. I just see a need and believe this is the best way I can contribute to the group.

Objective: To help other Anons improve their arguments, which could assist in persuading skeptics.

How:

• Identify common logical fallacies and explain how to avoid them.
• Provide practice opportunities by role-playing as a skeptical normie.

Please let me know if you're interested and feel free to contribute your own tips and insights that you believe can help the community.