Would anyone be interested in learning how to make better arguments in support of Q?
I've been thinking about this for a while, and I believe it could really help in convincing normies.
To clarify, I'm not trying to criticize anyone or present myself as a great debater. I just see a need and believe this is the best way I can contribute to the group.
Objective: To help other Anons improve their arguments, which could assist in persuading skeptics.
How:
- Identify common logical fallacies and explain how to avoid them.
- Provide practice opportunities by role-playing as a skeptical normie.
Please let me know if you're interested and feel free to contribute your own tips and insights that you believe can help the community.
I'm at the point where I no longer need to speak about Q unless someone who knew I posted on it on FB actually asks me specifically about it. The Q plans are exposing themselves regardless whether or not one ever followed Q. Those who needed to be awakened were already awakened. Those that needed to become digital soldiers have already done so. Now with X, Truth Social, Rumble the truth can come out.
I still believe in the Q plan and I will be there for everyone else who needs support after the SHTF in my neighborhood. But I don't need to expound on Q to do that any longer.
Some day maybe we will figure out who all the Q peeps are but for now I am comfy knowing the plan is proceeding to Trump taking over as our next POTUS once again.