Would anyone be interested in learning how to make better arguments in support of Q?
I've been thinking about this for a while, and I believe it could really help in convincing normies.
To clarify, I'm not trying to criticize anyone or present myself as a great debater. I just see a need and believe this is the best way I can contribute to the group.
Objective: To help other Anons improve their arguments, which could assist in persuading skeptics.
How:
- Identify common logical fallacies and explain how to avoid them.
- Provide practice opportunities by role-playing as a skeptical normie.
Please let me know if you're interested and feel free to contribute your own tips and insights that you believe can help the community.
It’s tough, I know. A tidbit: for women, look at 84 year old Nancy Pelosi on TV. She looks in her 30s. You have to pick and choose because there is a little older mask that is used sometimes. Maxine Waters has a big difference as well. Bidan with the brown eyes. Don’t push it. Let lie. You have formed the crack. Add in things like the Ukrainian in the body bag smoking a cigarette.
For guys start with Trump delivered on his promise of peace, prosperity and safety and will do so again. Who do you think would fight tooth and nail against that?
Once you have widened the cracks a little, then add some Q and the sauce to go with it.