From listening to Ogg’s conference, this guy mainly sounds guilty of fraud.
What I didn’t catch, which would be an interesting angle if provable, which it might not have been, is if his supervisor had been aware of his fraud and leveraged it to get specific voter stations to go offline.
Could easily avoid leaving a paper trail with that. Might be a very hard thing to prove.
It’s also hard to not get a bit indignant when this guy is making more at his SECOND job that he isn’t even doing than most people make at their first jobs.
What was he doing to justify $250,000 OR $90,000 a year?
From listening to Ogg’s conference, this guy mainly sounds guilty of fraud.
What I didn’t catch, which would be an interesting angle if provable, which it might not have been, is if his supervisor had been aware of his fraud and leveraged it to get specific voter stations to go offline.
Could easily avoid leaving a paper trail with that. Might be a very hard thing to prove.
If proven, would be great, but I don't think it's going to be that easy.
Probably not, unless the bosses got stupid.
It’s also hard to not get a bit indignant when this guy is making more at his SECOND job that he isn’t even doing than most people make at their first jobs.
What was he doing to justify $250,000 OR $90,000 a year?
That's what I was wondering already. Is he being paid by Soros?