If he's retired from Active Duty, he can still be subject to the UCMJ! The particular Article would be 106a! Why is everybody always just talking about it and not doing anything about it!
To be convicted of an Article 106 violation, the prosecution must demonstrate:
the accused impersonated an officer, noncommissioned officer, petty officer, or an agent of superior authority of one of the armed forces, or an official of a specific government in a particular manner; the impersonation was wrongful and willful.
Why is everyone so focused on this guy? Waste of energy in my opinion. We all know he is scum. Nobody votes for VP anyway.
Um ... it's indicative of her terrible judgement.
If he's retired from Active Duty, he can still be subject to the UCMJ! The particular Article would be 106a! Why is everybody always just talking about it and not doing anything about it! To be convicted of an Article 106 violation, the prosecution must demonstrate: the accused impersonated an officer, noncommissioned officer, petty officer, or an agent of superior authority of one of the armed forces, or an official of a specific government in a particular manner; the impersonation was wrongful and willful.
He did serve in the military. He inflated his service.